Comments on The Thomas Sowell Reader, “Income Distribution," Pages 98-107.
When statistics are brought up, like “The top earning 20% of
Americans, those making more than $100,000 each year, received 49.4% of all
income generated in the US compared with the 3.4% earned by those below the
poverty line [1]”, these stats are not talking about living
human beings, but households. The
media bases its opinions of income distribution on the average household income
that is prone to change and variables that discredit it from the Income
Distribution topic. There are too many conditions that make houses an
unreliable pointer for judging incomes.
Seldom is one house inhabited by one person. A house could be the home of two working parents and two
working children or more. A house could
be rented out to several people that all lead single lives with school, work,
or both. One cannot base opinions
on information that does not apply properly.
A front page New York
Times article declared that the “Top 0.1 percent of income earners--- the
top one-thousandth” was ‘super rich’ and that they “have even left behind
people making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year [2]”. While this report was based on
household incomes, a report based on living breathing humans showed that those
individuals dubbed as ‘super rich’ had their incomes drop 50 percent between
1995 and 2005 [3].
Things are not always as they seem, and even though the statistics were
not false, they were misleading.
If this is the not the only topic that is based on misleading
information, what other areas are we being fooled into believing deceptive news?
[1] The Global Report, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0FhoratGEk
[2] David Cay Johnston, “Richest Are Leaving Even The
Rich Far Behind,” New York Times,
June 5, 2005, section 1. Pp. 1 ff.
[3] U.S. Department of the Treasury, “Income Mobility
in the U.S. from 1996 to 2005,” November 13, 2007, p. 12.
No comments:
Post a Comment